Re: [aerogear-dev] Bundling Dependencies

Just a guess, would not require.js and creating customized Aerogear.js bundle per customer's scenario help here? On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:03:07 -0500 Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > So I have a dilemma on which I would like input from the team. In > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGJS-48 qmx reports that he gets: > > Uncaught ReferenceError: vertx is not defined at aerogear.js:2627 > > when using AeroGear.js in a blank page. The reason for this is that the full > build of AeroGear.js contains the new vert.x and STOMP over websocket > adapters for Notifier. These adapters have dependencies on vertxbus.js and > stomp.js respectively. Since they are not included in the page, you get that > error. Here is the dilemma. > > Do I bundle those files into AeroGear.js as part of the build when those > adapters are included or not? The reason I did not is because they are > external dependencies and I didn't want them bloating the file size just like > we do with jQuery. That said, it's obviously easy to not realize you need > those files, especially if you grab AeroGear.js and don't intend on using the > Notifier bits or just grab it and throw it in a page and see those errors as > qmx did. > > Thoughts? _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev