Re: [aerogear-dev] Preparation: UnifiedPush Server 1.0.0.Beta2 (was: Re: [UnifiedPush Server] release timelines)

Hi team, now that keycloak-beta4 was released, we have an updated PR from abstractj to use that version ([1]), combined w/ an upcoming release of our parent (to leverage the kc-beta4 JARs), see [2]. At the moment we have a few open PRs: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pulls Please review, but DO NOT merge them! Why? The KC PR goes in first, afterwards I will merge the other items, based on review feedback. By tomorrow that all should be done (read: merged) and there will be a staged repo for tests (and openshift updates), watch out for the email!

As mentioned on IRC, the nominees for the testing, are: * sblanc, cvasilak, dbevenius, lholmquist, lfryc and abstractj

Besides testing the UPS staging repo, please test our quickstarts (including their client SDKs) as well: * https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-helloworld * https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstarts (use the master branch - there will be a .Beta2 TAG, if all goes well there) Last but not least, please 'test' the documentation as well. For instance the new UPS guide: http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/ or other items of the new 'UPS doc center' :-) http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush Hopefully, by Wednesday we have an awesome 1.0.0.Beta2 and shortly after that we can go to CODE_FREEZE for the 1.0.0.Final Any thoughts ? -Matthias PS: others, besides the nominated folks, are welcome to test the things as well :) -Matthias [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-August/008658.html [2] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-August/008672.html On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > Hi team, > > based on [1] I thought about our release timelines until 1.0.0.Final, and > shortly after. > > - > > 1.0.0.Beta2 > <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12325092/?selectedTa...;: > 07/Aug/14 > > This needs to include Keycloak-beta4, and might slip by one day, but not > much more of a delay. > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf