+1
specially for a guide
it would be nice to match the released version.
On 26 May 2015 at 14:53, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
this would be nice.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas(a)fryc.eu> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Tadeas started a discussion about versioning documentation in the thread
> [1],
>
>
> and I must agree - it is a good idea to version documentation (and
> possibly also guides),
>
> especially since our UPS Console now points from the UI to the
> documentation -
> that is a great feature but I'm worried about maintanance of that
> solution, a documentation tend to change in time, with links no longer
> being valid.
>
>
> Lot of projects publish generated documentation separately, hosting it
> e.g. on
docs.jboss.org (see [2] for a sample).
>
> I'd suggest to version both, API documentation and guides on a separated
> server.
> Perhaps we could version whole site?
>
>
>
> WDYT?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> ~ Lukas
>
> [1]
>
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-UnifiedPush-Server...
> [2]
http://docs.jboss.org/richfaces/
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev