Re: [aerogear-dev] Angular.js branch and UPS
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
Good morning peeps,
While I was navigating at angular branch
(
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/angular_keyc...),
I notice
that you guys don't make use of keycloak.js
you guys ? :) it's more a 'we' are not using it ;-)
I was following this demo template from Bill:
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/project-integrations/aer...
No usage of keycloak.js there ;)
(
http://docs.jboss.org/keycloak/docs/1.0-alpha-3/userguide/html_single/ind...).
My
question is: why not? Or this something planned for the future?
sure, talking to Stian on IRC I got the impression it's good to be used
My concern is about reinvent what KC already did on the client side.
yep, fully agree - I can't access JIRA atm, otherwise I'd have created a
"keycloak.js usage" item under the AGPUSH-568 epic
--
abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 3.2 KB)