On Tuesday, March 11, 2014, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ok, for iOS we're going to release 1.5.0 planned early next week.
We'll do
ML announcements.
++
Corinne
Not only announcements of the actual release being done
IMO a mail w/ heads up here is the branch/tag we will release to CocoaPods
soon engages the community in being part of the actual release process;
-Matthias
On 11 March 2014 13:49, Luke Holmquist
<lholmqui@redhat.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lholmqui@redhat.com');>
> wrote:
> Makes sense. For the 1.4.0 js release coming out there will be a blog
> post announcing it. But next time we will do the heads up on the list.
> It wasn't on my index card 😁
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 11, 2014, at 7:53 AM, Bruno Oliveira
<bruno@abstractj.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bruno@abstractj.org');>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Makes sense.
> >
> > --
> > abstractj
> >
> > On March 11, 2014 at 8:34:36 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
(matzew@apache.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','matzew@apache.org');>)
> wrote:
> >>> yeah - I agree w/ these, the main point is really that before we
> >> ship a particular release (regardless of the platform), the
> >> dev-list should be given a heads-up for testing (similar to what
> >> you laid out).
> >>
> >> That way we don't 'silently' release a piece of software
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> >
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org');>
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
>
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org');>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile