On Oct 20, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Clarification: this was meant as UnifiedPushClient extension, rather then
SimplePush's one (bad wording)
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com
<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote:
I vote no for this.
I think storing messages, for any period of time is bad.
I think SimplePush should stay “Simple” and we should follow the spec on this.
> On Oct 20, 2014, at 8:59 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com
<mailto:scm.blanc@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm just worried about storing the message, for stuff like privacy, for instance.
Let's make a really short TTL or better let's delete the mesage right after it has
been retrieved.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com
<mailto:lukas.fryc@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Awesome, great to hear that SimplePush will get a native support for a full message
content.
>
> As Erik said, in the meantime, we could unify this behavior.
> I have created the associated issue:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1073
<
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1073>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com
<mailto:edewit@redhat.com>> wrote:
> Hi Lukáš,
>
> I like that idea, because in the end our goal is to unify. And I think that the
simple push protocol will be changed in the future to allow for ‘normal’ message sending.
So we could fallback afterwards.
>
> Cheers,
> Erik Jan
>
> On 20 Oct,2014, at 13:58 , Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com
<mailto:lukas.fryc@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I'm working on a demo of UPS pushing to iOS, Android, Windows, as well as
Firefox OS using our Cordova plugin.
>>
>> But as you know, with FFOS it is not that simple - since SimplePush protocol
allows to transfer just incremental versions, we are not able to deliver any interesting
message.
>>
>> UnifiedPush Server could be a correct place where we unify and shield our users
from this limitation:
>>
>>
>> my idea is storing the message on UPS under the SimplePush endpoint URL. Once the
message with version reaches the client, he would contact UPS to retrieve this message
under a key ( pushEndpoint, version ).
>>
>> The messages could have default built-in TTL to allow periodic cleanup.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> ~ Lukas
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev