On Dec 1, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Guys
Since AGIOS-255 (Basic/Digest auth for aerogear-ios-http) is under review and will be
merged soon, one question that pops up is: shall we use ag-ios-http lib to support push
registration in Swift lib (aerogear-ios-push). So far we’ve been using plain NSURLSession
to do it as it wasn’t yet ready on http lib.
I think there are two sides of it:
- eat your own dog food
- does it really make sense - looking at the "remove 2 lines, but will add
dependency"..... sounds like does not really make sense :)
I am fine in keeping it as it is.
+1 the lesser dependencies the better, in cases where it makes sense like here I guess.
-
Christos
Thanks for the insights!
-M
Doing so will remove 2 lines of boiler plate code but will add a dependency (although
internal to aerogear). As either ways seem fine for me, I’d like to have your views on
it.
++
Corinne
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev