Re: [aerogear-dev] AGPUSH Components

On May 21, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: What about the following Specific Components The following are very specific to a certain part of the "work": - UnifiedPush-server - UnifiedPush-ios - UnifiedPush-android - UnifiedPush-javascript - UnifiedPush-admin - UnifiedPush-java(-sender) - UnifiedPush-aps aps or apns? - UnifiedPush-gcm - UnifiedPush-simplePush (=== connection TO (various) SP networks) - SimplePush-server - SimplePush-javascript (=== client, I think there is only a JS client) Now, various of the above "component" have similar concerns, like * security* or *documentation*. <https://gist.github.com/matzew/90c9f6837eee6cb074cc#generic-components-eg... components (e.g. used like a tag) - security - Documentation - Examples - PushNetwork (e.g. when investigating for adding new supported ones...) - OpenShift (support for UP / SP) - Tooling (== Tooling / RAD ) Perhaps these are really more *tags*, but I am fine in "abusing" these components as tags. This looks great! GO GO GO GO! On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > +1 - I added a comment related to this. > > Also, I'm not sure if Jira has "Component Themes" like it has other > things, but there will be a lot of shared components between the various AG > Jira's. I think it will be important to be consistent where possible > (capitalization, abbreviations, naming, etc...). > > On May 20, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Bruno Oliveira wrote: > > > Not sure what's the main idea, but for security we can do something > like: > > > > AGPUSH-your-favorite-component-here, security > > > > If we start to create new components for security per project, it will > > add more confusion. At least to me. > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> Howdy, > >> > >> added a few comments > >> > >> > >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Daniel Bevenius > >> <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Looks good! > >> > >> > >> On 16 May 2013 18:38, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com > >> <mailto:kris@redhat.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Hey all, > >> > >> Please take a look at > >> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-11 and let me know if > you > >> would add/change/remove any suggested components I have > >> suggested there. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> aerogear-dev mailing list > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> aerogear-dev mailing list > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Matthias Wessendorf > >> > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> aerogear-dev mailing list > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev