Yes, let's move on with 0.10.1 and if really needed, we can indeed do later
0.10.2 with UI fixes.
Release the kraken !
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:14:05 +0100
Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > status looks like:
> >
> > * Integration tests - passed
> > * UI tests - failed - UI glitches in FF
> >
>
> known problem; not sure - but there might be already a ticket for it
>
>
> > * SP tests - passed
> > * Migration tests - failed - scheme problems.
> >
>
> possible - we might have changed the data model between 0.9.x and 0.10.x
>
>
> >
> > Migration is not a part of cartridge but I guess that UI should be
fixed.
> >
>
> It's minor, not sure we should really stop the process; especially the
UPS
> is now on staging/hold since one entire week
It's up to you. I believe that 0.10.1 has many improvements and if really
needed 0.10.2 with fixed UI can follow.
>
>
> >
> > I have filled following bugs:
> > *
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-562
> > *
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-563
> >
> > Note, as for Firefox DNS cache, just set
> > network.dnsCacheExpirationGracePeriod=0 in about:config.
> >
> > Karel
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev