Re: [aerogear-dev] GCM Topics feature branch

+1 let's work on it in a branch On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > +9001 I like use branch for WIP > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> So it looks like the work for properly supporting topics is going to >> grow. So far we have identified two areas for improvement already : >> * lfryc and I met this afternoon and discussed how to handle topic >> failures where calling back to registrationIds is appropriate. He has some >> refactors he wants to make. >> * Last night on the -users list a community member brought up some use >> case we have to consider as well. Specifically around how `alias` and >> `deviceType` interact with topics. >> >> In the spirit of keeping the PRs manageable, I propose we create a >> feature branches for topics in aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server and >> aerogear/aerogear-android-push. >> >> Barring strong opinions against this, I will create these branches and >> move my PRs appropriately. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > -- Passos > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev