On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 let's work on it in a branch
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> +9001 I like use branch for WIP
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com>
>> So it looks like the work for properly supporting topics is going to
>> grow. So far we have identified two areas for improvement already :
>> * lfryc and I met this afternoon and discussed how to handle topic
>> failures where calling back to registrationIds is appropriate. He has some
>> refactors he wants to make.
>> * Last night on the -users list a community member brought up some use
>> case we have to consider as well. Specifically around how `alias` and
>> `deviceType` interact with topics.
>> In the spirit of keeping the PRs manageable, I propose we create a
>> feature branches for topics in aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server and
>> Barring strong opinions against this, I will create these branches and
>> move my PRs appropriately.
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> -- Passos
> aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev mailing list