Re: [aerogear-dev] POC - Service Workers and Conflict Resolution

On Jan 6, 2015, at 3:38 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: It is very good idea, and a nice way how to integrate with existing libraries. It shields user from one round of conflict resolution handling. I have created a small diagram to better understand that and it revealed one more fact: https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1vIqYjfukHwb9HVuYAlf9eO5U_Eopgl9EOZyG2... <https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1vIqYjfukHwb9HVuYAlf9eO5U_Eopgl9EOZyG2... As seen on the diagram, user would still have to Merge on the programmatic layer, where we could offer a DiffMatchPatch alghoritm,

and/or integration with selected existing libraries (e.g. AngularJS ResoureProvider or Restangular or similar Ember approach).

I believe we don't have to handle "I work for second and later requests" problem you mentioned in the blog, since I assume ServiceWorker will react on the REST calls from the application once it is registered (not sure that's the case). That's with a question mark. :-)

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>> wrote: nice work! måndag 5 januari 2015 skrev Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com <mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>>: Here is my blog post on using Service Workers for Conflict Resolution http://blog.lholmquist.org/service-workers-can-settle-conflicts-too/ <http://blog.lholmquist.org/service-workers-can-settle-conflicts-too/> _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev> _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev