Re: [aerogear-dev] Dealing with UPS Keycloak data post-datasource-split

Hi Doug, On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> >> back to one schema, for 1.1.0 and do clean separation on 1.2.0? >> > > Worksforme(tm) > > +1 > ok, cool - I'd say - let's do that. So, since the KC part (e.g. new Keycloak versions), is covered by themselves, something like this [1] is not a huge issue, right? At least that's my understanding/assumption.

Related, we already have a vage epic to cover the separation, I have moved that to 1.2.0 [1] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/547 [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1047 > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf