Re: [aerogear-dev] New GH Repos and their names?

Ok... :) not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the repo name), but that's not really that important... for consistency, why not ? aerogear-simplepush-server aerogear-push-ios-demo aerogear-push-registration-ios aerogear-unified-push aerogear-unified-push-java-client On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: > yeah, these names do make sense! > > +1 > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: > >> So the repo names so far: >> >> aerogear-push-ios-demo >> aerogear-simplepush-server >> push-registration-ios >> unified-push >> unified-push-java-client >> >> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about >> consistency ;) >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -- >> qmx >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf