Since Aerogear also offers a SPS "server" maybe it will be
more clear if we specify it's a client lib like : aerogear-simplepush-java-client .
Concerning the UPS bits, let's keep it in the same module as long we document it.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
I just finished a quick POC to see how hard it would be to create a simple push java
client. And guess what it wasn’t hard at all only 20 / 30 lines of code. Now to make this
a proper lib I was struggling a bit with how to name this thing. So I’m keeping close to
the JS version as this is the same functionality. So I also have a UnifiedPushClient, that
enables you to register your simple push endpoint. This would be about one class so I
don’t think we would need a separate module for this. But that does make the naming of
this module harder :)
I was thinking just calling it aerogear-simplepush-java so what do you think?
Cheers,
Erik Jan
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev