On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Corinne Krych wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> I think one the goal of AeroGear is to provide an unified API across
> different platforms even if it brings some challenges…
> I'm convinced we can come up with a similar API for encryption.
That's exactly what I'm talking about, the APIs are similar, but they
should respect the languages' idiomatisms:
+1
// JS code
x.encrypt({a:'', b:''});
// Java code
x.encrypt(a, b);
Why should I impose Java style over JS?
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf