Idel,
on the Mozilla #push channel, I got pointed to this newer draft:
https://unicorn-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/
On that channel kitcambridge told me that the nightly FF is doing webpush,
instead of simplepush, when setting 'dom.push.serverURL, to an HTTPs
endpoint, following the above mentioned draft.
-Matthias
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Martin, Elio and Brian,
Thanks for the great work on WebPush protocol!
I'm a student of NRNU MEPhI and this year I take part in GSoC [1] with
AeroGear team [2]. I'm working on experimental project, which is called
"Aerogear WebPush Server" [3].
I'm watching for updates of WebPush protocol and discussions in this
mailing list and I will update our project to support the latest version.
I want to know about your current plans, when do you plan to release a new
draft? Maybe you know an approximate month?
Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
[1]
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015
[2]
https://aerogear.org/
[3]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-webpush-server
--
E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com
Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf