Idel, on the Mozilla #push channel, I got pointed to this newer draft: https://unicorn-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/ On that channel kitcambridge told me that the nightly FF is doing webpush, instead of simplepush, when setting 'dom.push.serverURL, to an HTTPs endpoint, following the above mentioned draft. -Matthias On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy < idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hello Martin, Elio and Brian, > > Thanks for the great work on WebPush protocol! > > I'm a student of NRNU MEPhI and this year I take part in GSoC [1] with > AeroGear team [2]. I'm working on experimental project, which is called > "Aerogear WebPush Server" [3]. > I'm watching for updates of WebPush protocol and discussions in this > mailing list and I will update our project to support the latest version. > I want to know about your current plans, when do you plan to release a > new draft? Maybe you know an approximate month? > > Best regards, > Idel Pivnitskiy > > [1] https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015 > [2] https://aerogear.org/ > [3] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-webpush-server > -- > E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com > Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> > GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev