Re: [aerogear-dev] message format change proposal
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
overall I am not against changes for 1.1.x, on our master branch. Here is
something that Sebi mentioned a few month ago:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-534
right I like this as well, but here the users data is also mixed with the
message, that was the point.
With some API change, coming up, let's not forget about "REST API
Versioning", he discussed at our Face2Face meeting:
http://oksoclap.com/p/jbrS1EHWkI
(looks like in that session the majority preferred headers over URI).
We have to support the 1.0.0 APIs for quite a while.
Sure, but because we have a version can’t mean that we cannot change
things I hope.
nah, not at all :-) That's why we discussed 'REST API Versioning' at the
meeting
We just need to have a good mechanism inlace to maintain these
versions.
yep, I'd say once that is in place, we can look at changing APIs
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.8 KB)