the collection is now lazy. But I’m sure other query optimisations can be made.
Cheers,
Erik Jan
On 26 May,2014, at 12:27 , Vivek Pandey <vivek.pandey(a)pinelabs.com> wrote:
Hi Matthias,
It is good to know that activity in java-apns is picking up and also that you are looking
at pushy.
I did a few tests which added installations to UPS with a concurrency of 4-8 threads. I
was using Postgres 9.3 and UPS 0.10.3 war
I noticed that response slowed down considerably after some time with high CPU usage and
continued to get worse. After doing some profiling, I found that bulk of CPU cycles are
being taken by org.postgresql.core.VisibleBufferedInputStream.readMore. The entire thread
stack is attached. Also postgres continuously flagged
select installati0_.variantID as variant10_0_0_, installati0_.id as id1_3_0_,
installati0_.id as id1_3_1_, installati0_.alias as alias2_3_1_, installati0_.deviceToken
as deviceTo3_3_1_, installati0_.deviceType as deviceTy4_3_1_, installati0_.enabled as
enabled5_3_1_, installati0_.operatingSystem as operatin6_3_1_, installati0_.osVersion as
osVersio7_3_1_, installati0_.platform as platform8_3_1_, installati0_.simplePushEndpoint
as simplePu9_3_1_ from InstallationImpl installati0_ where installati0_.variantID=$1
as the slow query. I am pretty sure that eager collection AbstractVariant.installations
is the root cause of the problem.
Please let me know if you need any more information.
Thanks
Vivek
From: mwessendorf(a)gmail.com [mailto:mwessendorf@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Matthias
Wessendorf
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:55 PM
To: vivek.pandey(a)pinelabs.com; AeroGear Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS Production worthiness
Hello Vivek!
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Vivek Pandey <vivek.pandey(a)pinelabs.com> wrote:
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your reply.
While we have not faced any issues in using UPS in our limited testing, I often see info
stacktraces in ups logs
2014-05-16 10:19:20,032 INFO [com.notnoop.apns.internal.ApnsConnectionImpl] (Thread-118)
Exception while waiting for error code: java.net.SocketException: Socket closed
at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:152) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:122) [rt.jar:1.7.0_51]
……………
at
com.notnoop.apns.internal.ApnsConnectionImpl$1MonitoringThread.run(ApnsConnectionImpl.java:114)
[apns-0.2.3.jar:]
These stacktraces coupled with low dev activity of noop/java-apns project are
disconcerting to me.
the stack-trace is no harm - it's only happening w/ doing a monitoring of the thread
(that's what we currently do, when setting up ApnsService - I thought about explicitly
disable that)
The activity of the underlying java-apns is very low, yes! However @froh42 is getting
back:
https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/commits/master
There will be a new release in the near future; @froh42 asked me if I could help with
pushing the bits to maven central
That said, I recently started looking at pushy:
https://github.com/relayrides/pushy
I also sent a PR that would allow us to feed pushy w/ our certificate from the database:
https://github.com/relayrides/pushy/pull/87
Hope that helps
-Matthias
I am currently using UPS 0.10.2 war.
Thanks,
Vivek
From: Jay Balunas [mailto:jbalunas@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:36 PM
To: vivek.pandey(a)pinelabs.com; AeroGear Developer Mailing List
Cc: Jay Balunas
Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS Production worthiness
Hi Vivek,
It's awesome to hear that you have integrated the UPS into your backend systems and
some of your mobile apps!
We have a lot of confidence around the UPS, its functionality, and performance. Our team
has been working hard on improvements and stability including our QE team. Also, as you
may have seen we're planning a 1.0 release of the UPS this summer.
However at this time we don't have specific references or success stories outside of
what you can see in the community mailing lists - other users using it ;-) We're also
about to kick off some performance and scale testing in the next couple of months.
Have you run into any issues that drove these questions about production worthiness? If
so please let us know and we'll certainly take a look.
Hope this helps!
Thanks,
Jay Balunas
On May 20, 2014, at 8:09 AM, Vivek Pandey <vivek.pandey(a)pinelabs.com> wrote:
Hello Aerogear dev team,
We integrated UPS into our backend server which is serving various mobile apps. While the
development and testing phase went well, my manager is questioning me about production
worthiness about Aerogear. It would be great help if you could point me to
references/success stories where UPS is being used in production environments and scaling
well in medium to high loads.
Thanks,
Vivek
This message may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely for the
use of intended recipient. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and
not of Pine Labs. The recipient should check this email and attachments for the presence
of viruses / malwares etc. Pine Labs accepts no liability for any damage caused by any
virus transmitted by this email. Pine Labs may monitor and record all emails.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
This message may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely for the
use of intended recipient. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and
not of Pine Labs. The recipient should check this email and attachments for the presence
of viruses / malwares etc. Pine Labs accepts no liability for any damage caused by any
virus transmitted by this email. Pine Labs may monitor and record all emails.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
This message may contain privileged and confidential information and is solely for the
use of intended recipient. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and
not of Pine Labs. The recipient should check this email and attachments for the presence
of viruses / malwares etc. Pine Labs accepts no liability for any damage caused by any
virus transmitted by this email. Pine Labs may monitor and record all emails.
<threadstack.txt>_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev