that original order is also fine w/ me;
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Good point previous site was listed as:
*JS
* iOS
* android
* hybrid
which I think was a good order because it's ordered per category web vs
native.
I didn't really pay attention to the changes order tbh, let's fix!
++
Corinne
On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
on the site :-)
http://staging.aerogear.org/
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering about something...
>
> the list:
> * iOS
> * Android
> * Web
> * Hybrid
>
> Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has higher
> prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc....
>
> I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-)
>
> So my 'politically correct' list would be like:
> * Android
> * Hybrid
> * iOS
> * Web
>
>
> does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect
> 'misinterpretations' ?
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev