On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I like them, both "modules"
I like modules (and solutions :-))
and "sub-projects" are better than "features".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Jan de Wit" <edewit(a)redhat.com>
To: aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:09:49 AM
Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] wording change
On 17/12/2014 17:40, Andres Galante wrote:
> I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
>
> They think think that we should change the word "features" to
"solutions" or "components".
I hate "solutions" with a passion, and "components" is not the right
word. How about "modules" or "sub-projects"
>
> It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4
different products and the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
>
> What do you think?
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf