1:40 a.m.
I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
They think think that we should change the word "features" to
"solutions" or "components".
It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4 different products and
the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
What do you think?
9:23 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
They think think that we should change the word "features" to
"solutions"
or "components".
I like solutions
It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4
different products
how comes the number of four ?
we have several 'solutions' out. Like:
* SimplePush Server
* UnifiedPush Server
And in progress in progress:
* OAuth2 (client libraries for Android, Cordova and OS)
* Sync Server
* WebPush Server
Besides that, we do have solid client APIs for mobile platforms like
Android and iOS (e.g. http API layer ). We also have security
features/solutions, like our own TOTP support (Android + iOS)
and the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
What do you think?
Glad you are looking into all this. I am now reflecting that it was
actually overdue to work on homepage improvements. Great job Andres
-M
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
9:33 p.m.
The 4 solutions comes from the way we separate things on the website:
Aerogear Core
Aerogear Sync
Aerogear Security
Aerogear Push
Does it makes sense?
On website I have removed the top bar for search and repo and did a lot of small changes
everywhere. I will restructure today guides and docs, plus if you go to community you can
see our faces :)
https://github.com/andresgalante/aerogear.org/tree/new-design
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org>
To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 9:23:08 AM
Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] wording change
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Andres Galante < agalante(a)redhat.com > wrote:
I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
They think think that we should change the word "features" to
"solutions" or "components".
I like solutions
It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4 different products
how comes the number of four ?
we have several 'solutions' out. Like:
* SimplePush Server
* UnifiedPush Server
And in progress in progress:
* OAuth2 (client libraries for Android, Cordova and OS)
* Sync Server
* WebPush Server
Besides that, we do have solid client APIs for mobile platforms like Android and iOS (e.g.
http API layer ). We also have security features/solutions, like our own TOTP support
(Android + iOS)
and the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
What do you think?
Glad you are looking into all this. I am now reflecting that it was actually overdue to
work on homepage improvements. Great job Andres
-M
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
10:09 p.m.
On 17/12/2014 17:40, Andres Galante wrote:
I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
They think think that we should change the word "features" to
"solutions" or "components".
I hate "solutions" with a passion, and "components" is not the right
word. How about "modules" or "sub-projects"
It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4 different products and
the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
What do you think?
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
10:33 p.m.
I like them, both "modules" and "sub-projects" are better than
"features".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Jan de Wit" <edewit(a)redhat.com>
To: aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:09:49 AM
Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] wording change
On 17/12/2014 17:40, Andres Galante wrote:
I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
They think think that we should change the word "features" to
"solutions" or "components".
I hate "solutions" with a passion, and "components" is not the right
word. How about "modules" or "sub-projects"
It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4 different products and
the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
What do you think?
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
11:09 p.m.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I like them, both "modules"
I like modules (and solutions :-))
and "sub-projects" are better than "features".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Jan de Wit" <edewit(a)redhat.com>
To: aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:09:49 AM
Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] wording change
On 17/12/2014 17:40, Andres Galante wrote:
> I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
>
> They think think that we should change the word "features" to
"solutions" or "components".
I hate "solutions" with a passion, and "components" is not the right
word. How about "modules" or "sub-projects"
>
> It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4
different products and the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
>
> What do you think?
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
7:56 p.m.
+1 for modules
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> I like them, both "modules"
I like modules (and solutions :-))
> and "sub-projects" are better than "features".
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Erik Jan de Wit" <edewit(a)redhat.com>
> To: aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:09:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] wording change
>
>
> On 17/12/2014 17:40, Andres Galante wrote:
> > I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
> >
> > They think think that we should change the word "features" to
> "solutions" or "components".
>
> I hate "solutions" with a passion, and "components" is not the
right
> word. How about "modules" or "sub-projects"
>
> >
> > It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4
> different products and the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
> >
> > What do you think?
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
7:57 p.m.
+1 for modules
On 19 December 2014 at 11:56, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me> wrote:
+1 for modules
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I like them, both "modules"
>
>
> I like modules (and solutions :-))
>
>
>> and "sub-projects" are better than "features".
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Erik Jan de Wit" <edewit(a)redhat.com>
>> To: aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:09:49 AM
>> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] wording change
>>
>>
>> On 17/12/2014 17:40, Andres Galante wrote:
>> > I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
>> >
>> > They think think that we should change the word "features" to
>> "solutions" or "components".
>>
>> I hate "solutions" with a passion, and "components" is not
the right
>> word. How about "modules" or "sub-projects"
>>
>> >
>> > It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4
>> different products and the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > aerogear-dev mailing list
>> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
10:46 p.m.
+1 for modules
On 12/19/2014 05:57 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
+1 for modules
On 19 December 2014 at 11:56, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me
<mailto:daniel@passos.me>> wrote:
+1 for modules
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Andres Galante
<agalante(a)redhat.com <mailto:agalante@redhat.com>> wrote:
I like them, both "modules"
I like modules (and solutions :-))
and "sub-projects" are better than "features".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Jan de Wit" <edewit(a)redhat.com
<mailto:edewit@redhat.com>>
To: aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:09:49 AM
Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] wording change
On 17/12/2014 17:40, Andres Galante wrote:
> I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
>
> They think think that we should change the word
"features" to "solutions" or "components".
I hate "solutions" with a passion, and "components" is
not
the right
word. How about "modules" or "sub-projects"
>
> It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is
actually 4 different products and the word "features"
doesn't reflect that.
>
> What do you think?
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Summers Pittman
>Phone:404 941 4698
>Java is my crack.
11:17 p.m.
Modules, Modules, Modules ( said in Best Steve Ballmer voice )
On Dec 19, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Summers Pittman
<supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
+1 for modules
On 12/19/2014 05:57 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> +1 for modules
>
> On 19 December 2014 at 11:56, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me
<mailto:daniel@passos.me>> wrote:
> +1 for modules
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org
<mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com
<mailto:agalante@redhat.com>> wrote:
> I like them, both "modules"
>
> I like modules (and solutions :-))
>
> and "sub-projects" are better than "features".
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Erik Jan de Wit" <edewit(a)redhat.com
<mailto:edewit@redhat.com>>
> To: aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:09:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] wording change
>
>
> On 17/12/2014 17:40, Andres Galante wrote:
> > I've shared the new website at the UX team meeting today.
> >
> > They think think that we should change the word "features" to
"solutions" or "components".
>
> I hate "solutions" with a passion, and "components" is not the
right
> word. How about "modules" or "sub-projects"
>
> >
> > It seems that it is hard to understand that aerogear is actually 4 different
products and the word "features" doesn't reflect that.
> >
> > What do you think?
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
<http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/>
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
<http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
--
Summers Pittman
>>Phone:404 941 4698
>>Java is my crack.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
3429
days inactive
3431
days old
9 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Andres Galante -
Daniel Bevenius -
Daniel Passos -
Erik Jan de Wit -
Lucas Holmquist -
Matthias Wessendorf -
Summers Pittman