On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:09:55PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
I would like to propose we only run Travis on changes to master
PR, etc). The problem I am having is pushing broken code to branches
for review, testing, etc. is causing Travis to mark the repo as broken
in the status image which is not true. Anyone have any other thoughts
on this or feel that Travis breaking on branches is at all useful?
I tend to lazily push branches while I'm fixing stuff (and waiting for
travis feedback), but I'm fine with travis only running on the branch
when I actually open the PR.