On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
I'm not sure what the reason for this was historically. I think
this
concept was initally created when we were doing Pipeline.
Wasn't that because you want to share configuration of stores in one
DataManager?
But fully agree, it does not make much sense from user's perspective - you
can share options object anyway.
I am leaning toward proposing we get rid of this pattern and just
make a
DataManager object hold 1 store/adapter( sync woud follow suit )
+1 agree