Yep, as I said yesterday at our meeting ;)
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Looks like the Security Document should be updated too?
http://staging-aerogear.rhcloud.com/docs/planning/1.0.0/AeroGearSecurity/
(talks about beta)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org
(mailto:matzew@apache.org)> wrote:
> Glad, I asked :)
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com
(mailto:kris@redhat.com)> wrote:
> > Android should not have a beta. I had a beta originally but was told to change
to milestones in JS.
> >
> > On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org
(mailto:matzew@apache.org)> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am looking at polishing the iOS roadmap and did take a look at the
> > > roadmaps for Android and JS (see [1] and [2]).
> > >
> > > Personally I think they are kinda confusing, since they talk about
> > > different releases...
> > >
> > > The JS lib talks about:
> > > - 1.0.0.Alpha1 (and says release with AeroGear 1.0.0M5)
> > > - 1.0.0.M1 (and says release with AeroGear 1.0.0M6)
> > > - 1.0.0.M2 (and says release with AeroGear 1.0.0M7)
> > > - 1.0.0.CR1 (and says release with AeroGear 1.0.0CR)
> > > - 1.0.0.Final (and says release with AeroGear 1.0.0Final)
> > >
> > > While the Android lib talks about:
> > > - 1.0.0.Alpha1 (and says release with AeroGear 1.0.0M6)
> > > - 1.0.0.Alpha2
> > > - 1.0.0.Beta
> > > - 1.0.0.Final
> > >
> > > Not sure if it's helpful if the different libs use different terms
> > > (e.g. Alpha vs. milestone vs. beta)...
> > >
> > > What's clear (if I get it right) are the 'raw' release dates
for the
> > > 'umbrella AeroGear' releases:
> > > - 1.0.0M6 ==> ~ mid Oct 2012
> > > - 1.0.0M7 ==> ~ mid Dec 2012
> > > - 1.0.0CR ==> ~ mid Feb 2013
> > > - 1.0.0Final ==> ~ mid Apr 2013
> > > (basically, every 8 weeks, right ?)
> > >
> > > What's also clear (IMO) is that these individual components do NOT
> > > need to match the exact 'release label' of the 'umbrella'
AeroGear...
> > > But... not sure if they should at least kinda match a common
> > > 'semantic' (e.g. Milestone, Beta etc). I tend to say yes here...
> > >
> > > Background:
> > > I want to know the 'labeling' because I am TRYING :) to identify
> > > reasonable pieces for the iOS library, to be released along the
> > > 'umbrella' AeroGear release, but got confused since Android has a
beta
> > > and JS has 'only' milestones :)
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > [1]
http://staging-aerogear.rhcloud.com/docs/planning/1.0.0/AeroGearAndroid/
> > > [2]
http://staging-aerogear.rhcloud.com/docs/planning/1.0.0/AeroGearJS/
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org)
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org)
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org)
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev