Re: [aerogear-dev] [UnifiedPush] cascase deletes ?

What do you mean with both ? On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: is it possible to do both? On Nov 22, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > I was wondering if we should do cascading deletes for the device metadata.... > > So, right now, when you are deleting a variant, all its installations are NOT nuked, which helps when you are interested in collecting data.... > > > However we could nuke em, not sure.... > > Or... should we move them into a "DELETED" table? > > Users of the UnifiedPush Server might be interested in keeping the data around, a bit .... > > I am not sure... > > > -Matthias > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev