On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/20/2012 08:29 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Hi team,
>>
>> as part of the API overhaul ticket[1] for the next CR1 release, we are
suggesting a rename of the the AGRestAdapter to AGRESTAdapter. Because REST is more an
official term it can be used in the context. Typical examples in the iOS land:
>>
>> NSURL (and not NSUrl)
>> NSHTTPCookie (and not NSHttpCookie)
>>
>> What do you think?
> +1 on the renaming!
>
>
> Thinking a bit more on that... I am not 100% sure with: AGRESTAdapter
>
> The 'AGRESTAdapter' is basically a Pipe implementation for a restful
> connection.... not sure if we should honor that fact (pipe impl) into
> the name of the class;
>
> Hrm... hard :)
> One (odd) suggestion could be 'AGRESTfulPipeAdapter'
Why not AGRESTPipe?
I like it
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>> A ticket has been already opened for this case, see [2]
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Christos
>>
>>
>> [1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-763
>> [2]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-765
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf