what is the advantage of moving the apbs to their own org?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Craig Brookes <cbrookes(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> As mentioned by John having a consistent pattern for our services and
> their various pieces (cli, apb, ui) etc needs to be figured out.
>
> The options:
>
> *Single Repo: * We kinda ruled this one out as it unlikely it would work
> well against 3rd part integrations such as 3scale or keycloak.
>
>
> *Repo for each piece: *Lots of overhead and different repos. Off the top
> of my head it would be:
> - repo for any cli piece
> - repo for client sdks (iOS, android, cordova) etc ..
> - repo for APB
>
I'd think this is cleanest - each artifact has it's own repository
In addition, I think we could also move all the apbs to its own GH org.
(aerogearplaybookbundles)
>
> *Single Repo for clients*
> - 1 repo for cli, sdks and (maybe UI too?)
> - 1 repo for APB (not a client but is a deployment mechanism).
>
>
> Any other or better options people can think of?
>
> --
> Craig Brookes
> RHMAP
> @maleck13 Github
>
> _______________________________________________
> feedhenry-dev mailing list
> feedhenry-dev(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>
>
--
Project lead
AeroGear.org
--
Craig Brookes
RHMAP
@maleck13 Github