On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Egor Kolesnikov <
egor.kolesnikov(a)fastlane-it.com> wrote:
Hi Matthias
That’s correct – we are already using Keycloak to secure our RESTful APIs
for mobile and web client access. Not that having separate installation for
exclusive Aerogear is a dealbreaker, but it would re-introduce the problem
Keycloak was supposed to solve in the first place J
fully understand! But we, initially, felt like limiting a bit. that said,
we are flexible and there might be a chance to have this changed
I can see that UpsSecurityApplication class kills off Keycloak admin user
in master realm – would it break anything if I disabled this feature and
started using Aerogear-supplied Keycloak for other purposes on separate
realms?
I don't think so (not tested). I recall we did this mainly to avoid adding
new realms
Our use case is mobile app (iOS+android), backend and AngularJS-based web
frontend and so far Keycloak fits our purpose like a glove. Now that we’re
adding Push notification support, Aerogear appears to be quite logical
choice.
sounds great!
Thanks
Egor
*From:* aerogear-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
aerogear-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Matthias Wessendorf
*Sent:* Tuesday, 14 October 2014 12:29 AM
*To:* AeroGear Developer Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: [aerogear-dev] Using existing Keycloak installation with
Aerogear
Hi,
for the UnifiedPush Server the initial integration case was to function
only for the need of the AeroGear UnifiedPush server.
So, looks like, you'd appreciate a bit more flexibility, to basically use
the auth-server for other apps as well ?
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:18 PM, ekolesnikov <ek(a)fastlane-it.com> wrote:
Hi,
Apologies for writing straight into DEV forums - I was unable to locate
"aerogear-users" mailing list anywhere. Please feel free to point me to the
right direction if this mailing list is inappropriate for questions like
this.
Is it possible to use/integrate Aerogear with existing Keycloak
installation? We are already using Keycloak for all things auth in our
application and have found ourselves in the situation where we potentially
have to manage separate infrastructure - which makes the whole point of
using Keycloak a bit irrelevant.
As an alternative, we could consider using Keycloak supplied with with
Aerogear - unfortunately, it looks like Aerogear has disabled Keycloak
option to create additional realms.
I would really appreciate it if you could share your thought on this.
Thanks
Egor
--
View this message in context:
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/Using-existing-Keycloak-install...
Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
------------------------------
<
http://www.avast.com/>
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
<
http://www.avast.com/> protection is active.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf