+1 let's work on it in a branch
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com> wrote:
+9001 I like use branch for WIP
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> So it looks like the work for properly supporting topics is going to
> grow. So far we have identified two areas for improvement already :
> * lfryc and I met this afternoon and discussed how to handle topic
> failures where calling back to registrationIds is appropriate. He has some
> refactors he wants to make.
> * Last night on the -users list a community member brought up some use
> case we have to consider as well. Specifically around how `alias` and
> `deviceType` interact with topics.
>
> In the spirit of keeping the PRs manageable, I propose we create a
> feature branches for topics in aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server and
> aerogear/aerogear-android-push.
>
> Barring strong opinions against this, I will create these branches and
> move my PRs appropriately.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
-- Passos
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev