On 2014-05-21, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Oliveira
<bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
> Good morning peeps,
>
> While I was navigating at angular branch
> (
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/angular_keyc...),
> I notice
> that you guys don't make use of keycloak.js
>
you guys ? :) it's more a 'we' are not using it ;-)
meh, bad wording.
I was following this demo template from Bill:
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/project-integrations/aer...
No usage of keycloak.js there ;)
In theory we do
(
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/pom.x...). Maybe
we
just don't use it?
> (
>
http://docs.jboss.org/keycloak/docs/1.0-alpha-3/userguide/html_single/ind...).
> My
> question is: why not? Or this something planned for the future?
>
sure, talking to Stian on IRC I got the impression it's good to be used
>
> My concern is about reinvent what KC already did on the client side.
>
yep, fully agree - I can't access JIRA atm, otherwise I'd have created a
"keycloak.js usage" item under the AGPUSH-568 epic
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj