On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Aug 5, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’
>
>
> +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’ too
while i like ‘unifiedpush-node-sender’ i sort of didn’t want to put the word node in it.
if you are searching on npm/using npm to install something. it’s node
although, if this also has a CLI component to it, that might make sense then, ‘$
unifiedpush-node-sender ….. ‘
i’m so torn :)
he! ja, it's valid concerns!
ok, lets go with ‘unifiedpush-node-sender'
soundz good to me
ok, i’ll go with it,
@matzew, could you update the component in the AGPUSH JIRA to be UnifiedPush-node-sender
i wouldn’t rename the github repo thought.
+1
>
>
>>
>> tisdag 5 augusti 2014 skrev Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me>:
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> Do we want to also rename it.
>>
>> the java sender is called( in maven ), ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’
>>
>> while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’
>>
>> i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or
‘unifiedpush-sender’
>>
>> I like that
>>
>> +1 for ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’
>>
>> Or unifiedpush-node-sender
>>
>> what do others think?
>>
>>
>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> :), do we a JIRA, i can whip something up for a guide
>>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> Whenever Luke is ready ? :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira
<bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> When?
>>>>
>>>> On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>>>> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi there,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > a few questions:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > * based on
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a...
>>>> > >
>>>> > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ?
>>>> > >
>>>> > yes
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we
can link here:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat...
>>>> > >
>>>> > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README
of the
>>>> > github which contains instructions.
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thanks!
>>>> > > Matthias
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > Matthias Wessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev