Hi there, a few questions: * based on https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a... should we do a new release of the node.js sender ?

* going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link here: http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat...

Thanks! Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > Hi there, > > a few questions: > > * based on > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a... > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ? > yes > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link here: > > http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat... > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of the github which contains instructions. > > > Thanks! > Matthias > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >

_______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Whenever Luke is ready ? :) On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: +1 When? On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote: > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > a few questions: > > > > * based on > > > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a... > > > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ? > > > yes > > > > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link here: > > > > http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat... > > > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of the > github which contains instructions. > > > > > > > Thanks! > > Matthias > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- abstractj PGP: 0x84DC9914 _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Do we want to also rename it. the java sender is called( in maven ), ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’ while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’ i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’

what do others think? On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: :), do we a JIRA, i can whip something up for a guide On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: Whenever Luke is ready ? :) On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > +1 > > When? > > On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > a few questions: > > > > > > * based on > > > > > > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a... > > > > > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ? > > > > > yes > > > > > > > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link here: > > > > > > > http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat... > > > > > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of the > > github which contains instructions. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Matthias > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf >

+1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’

tisdag 5 augusti 2014 skrev Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me&gt;: On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: Do we want to also rename it. the java sender is called( in maven ), ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’ while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’ i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’ I like that +1 for ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’ Or unifiedpush-node-sender what do others think? On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > :), do we a JIRA, i can whip something up for a guide > On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >> Whenever Luke is ready ? :) >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: >> +1 >> >> When? >> >> On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi there, >> > > >> > > a few questions: >> > > >> > > * based on >> > > >> > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a... >> > > >> > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ? >> > > >> > yes >> > >> > > >> > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link here: >> > > >> > > http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat... >> > > >> > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of the >> > github which contains instructions. >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > > Matthias >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Matthias Wessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Aug 5, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’ +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’ too while i like ‘unifiedpush-node-sender’ i sort of didn’t want to put the word node in it. if you are searching on npm/using npm to install something. it’s node although, if this also has a CLI component to it, that might make sense then, ‘$ unifiedpush-node-sender ….. ‘ i’m so torn :)

ok, lets go with ‘unifiedpush-node-sender'

i wouldn’t rename the github repo thought.

tisdag 5 augusti 2014 skrev Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me&gt;: > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Do we want to also rename it. >> >> the java sender is called( in maven ), ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’ >> >> while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’ >> >> i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or >> ‘unifiedpush-sender’ >> > > I like that > > +1 for ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’ > > Or unifiedpush-node-sender > > >> what do others think? >> >> >> On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> :), do we a JIRA, i can whip something up for a guide >> On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >> wrote: >> >> Whenever Luke is ready ? :) >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> When? >>> >>> On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote: >>> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < >>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi there, >>> > > >>> > > a few questions: >>> > > >>> > > * based on >>> > > >>> > > >>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a... >>> > > >>> > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ? >>> > > >>> > yes >>> > >>> > > >>> > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link >>> here: >>> > > >>> > > >>> http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat... >>> > > >>> > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of the >>> > github which contains instructions. >>> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks! >>> > > Matthias >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Matthias Wessendorf >>> >> _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Aug 5, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > > On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’ > > > > +1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’ too > > > while i like ‘unifiedpush-node-sender’ i sort of didn’t want to put the > word node in it. if you are searching on npm/using npm to install > something. it’s node > > although, if this also has a CLI component to it, that might make sense > then, ‘$ unifiedpush-node-sender ….. ‘ > > > i’m so torn :) > he! ja, it's valid concerns! > > ok, lets go with ‘unifiedpush-node-sender' > soundz good to me ok, i’ll go with it, @matzew, could you update the component in the AGPUSH JIRA to be UnifiedPush- <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/component/12317551> node-sender > > i wouldn’t rename the github repo thought. > +1 > > > > > > tisdag 5 augusti 2014 skrev Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me&gt;: > >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Do we want to also rename it. >>> >>> the java sender is called( in maven ), ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’ >>> >>> while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’ >>> >>> i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or >>> ‘unifiedpush-sender’ >>> >> >> I like that >> >> +1 for ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’ >> >> Or unifiedpush-node-sender >> >> >>> what do others think? >>> >>> >>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>> :), do we a JIRA, i can whip something up for a guide >>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>> Whenever Luke is ready ? :) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> When? >>>> >>>> On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote: >>>> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < >>>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > Hi there, >>>> > > >>>> > > a few questions: >>>> > > >>>> > > * based on >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a... >>>> > > >>>> > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ? >>>> > > >>>> > yes >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link >>>> here: >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat... >>>> > > >>>> > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of >>>> the >>>> > github which contains instructions. >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > Thanks! >>>> > > Matthias >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev