Re: [aerogear-dev] Keycloak user/roles management

On 2014-05-26, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > > > > > Good morning peeps, after the latest change[1] correct me if I'm wrong. But > > I think KC and UPS will do pretty much what we need. > > > > We have a push admin and the super user on KC side enabled. Let me know > > if that is what you need and I will take a look at viewer role. > > > > One thing that I noticed: when I login as 'admin', I don't see the > applications created by 'user' > I think with that change, the 'admin' is the overall Keycloak-Admin. With the recent changes we have 2 admins: - KC admin - UPS admin I think the UPS admin should have the visibility of all applications created, right? I will look at this.

> > > I had a chat w/ Stian in the past, for the above mentioned > "super-user" (which is leveraging the Keycloak realm) Stian and I were > thinking of a "Super User", that simply has not all permissions. For > instance, it would have: > * AdminRoles.VIEW_USERS > * AdminRoles.MANAGE_USERS > > But it would not have the "AdminRoles.ADMIN" role. As we don't need to have > that guy/super-user being able to create realms or other applications, just > the "user access" items. > > I guess that's why we did see the 'remove()' before I understand the permission scope restriction for KC admin (aka super-user). But if we remove the admin, how could you login to manage users/roles?

> > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > [1] - > > > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/3e118b1c75... > > > > > > On 2014-05-21, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > Just a thought... regarding those two roles 'PushAdmin' and 'Super-User', > > > IMO the Super-user should be able to see all apps (and their variants, > > > including registered devices). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thank you Matthias, I will look at it and return back with more > > > > questions if necessary. > > > > > > > > On 2014-05-21, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > yes - the handling is done by Keycloak itself; Last time we looked at > > > > user > > > > > management, we had the following in terms of roles: > > > > > > > > > > https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/6547605 > > > > > > > > > > Not sure the names of these roles are great.... let's see > > > > > > > > > > Basically I think the role definition in the gist still addresses > > most of > > > > > what we want to archive: > > > > > * super-user: in charge of managing the UPS realm (including users); > > can > > > > > see _ALL_ push applications (that's the admin in Sebi's gist) > > > > > * PushAdmin: Someone that can manage applications and variants, but > > is > > > > not > > > > > able to add new users; he also sees only his applications/variants > > etc > > > > > (that's the developer in sebis gist) > > > > > > > > > > The gist also contains a 'Viewer' role - At this point I am not sure > > we > > > > do > > > > > really need this. My impression is that if we have PushAdmins for our > > > > 1.0.0 > > > > > community release that will be enough. > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Bruno Oliveira < > > bruno(a)abstractj.org > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Good morning peeps, > > > > > > > > > > > > Before I jump in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-639. I > > would > > > > > > like to understand what do you guys want say with this issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently Keycloak already has its own user/roles managements. > > What do > > > > > > you guys are looking for? Any specific requirements? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > abstractj > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > abstractj > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > -- > > > > abstractj > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- abstractj _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev