Re: [aerogear-dev] rfc repository

Hello Leonardo, personally I think that using GitHub issues in respective projects would be easier. Issue comments are perfect for discussion. PRs can be nicely linked to issues. Etc. Best regards, Oleg On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Leonardo Rossetti <lrossett(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hello, > > I was thinking if we could create a "proposals/rfc" repository in > Aerogear's GH organization, as the name implies, it would contain > enhancement proposals for all Aerogear projects. > > My main motivation for this is to have a public and official place to > track all enhancements/ideas. > > I this repository could contain: > > - proposal document template > - track proposals status: > - draff > - approved > - implementation > - done > > A couple of projects use this approach: ansible > <https://github.com/ansible/proposals>;, rust > <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs>;, python > <https://github.com/python/peps>;, and the list goes on. > > WDYT? > > -- > > LEONARDO ROSSETTI > > SOFTWARE ENGINEER > > Red Hat SP <https://www.redhat.com/> > > lrossett(a)redhat.com M: 11997030621 > <https://red.ht/sig> > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Oleg Matskiv Associate Quality Engineer Red Hat Mobile Application Platform omatskiv(a)redhat.com _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev