On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:59 PM, JR Conlin <jrconlin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+4
(sorry, just had some fun with a bounding issue, and felt like sharing.)
Just to let y'all know, we're going to be running SimplePush for a while,
mostly for older devices. One thing we discovered is that some clients may
have a LARGE number of old channels registered and sending them as part of
the Hello is a waste. (Our server doesn't pay attention to them.) Newer
clients may have an interim fix that blanks the clientIDs:[] record.) Aside
from that, we're definitely not going to be pushing any changes that should
impact your library.
We've not stood up a production WebPush server, partly because the data
encryption portion of the standard is still under discussion. For what it's
worth, there are also a few other discussion points that have yet to be
finalized (e.g. should developers register with servers, should clients
specify channels like they did for SimplePush, etc.) but the data bit is
the biggest obstacle.
i see that PushAPI is enabled in FF42, and i've successfully gotten
notifications with a test i did, what kind of server are you using then?
i noticed that in the"dom.push.serverURL" is wss://
push.services.mozilla.com/
As always, thanks so much for the continuing support.
On 8/31/2015 12:45 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy wrote:
+1
Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
--
E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com
Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Daniel Bevenius <
daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> måndag 31 augusti 2015 skrev Sebastien Blanc < <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>
> scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> so now that WebPush is going to take over SimplePush, i'm thinking of
>>> closing the related JIRA's that we have open for simple push in the
AG-JS
>>> instance.
>>>
>>>
>>> Not that we've really done any work on it lately, but it would be good
>>> to clean this up a little.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> -Luke
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing
listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev