On Monday, February 10, 2014, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Lucas Holmquist
<lholmqui@redhat.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lholmqui@redhat.com');>
> wrote:
> here is the current format for comparison
>
>
https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/8915817
>
> +1 to being more structured.
>
> one thing though, in the current format, simplePush is not part of the
> message, but it's own thing
>
Yeah, that's why I put it in the config section in my first version but
Matzew suggested it was more part of the message payload
Nope to config; should stay its own, does not (IMO) make sense to include
in tve message for richer platforms like Android/iOS
On Feb 9, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at our current Push Message Format[1] and I was wonderimg if
you should not add some more structure to it, decoupling config, criterias
and the message itself :
{
"config" : {
"ttl" : 3600,
"content-available" : true,
"simple-push": "version=123"
},
"criteria" : {
"alias" : ["user(a)account.com",
"someone(a)aerogear.org", ....],
"categories" : ["someCategory", "otherCategory"],
"deviceType" : ["iPad", "AndroidTablet"],
"variants" : ["c3f0a94f-48de-4b77-a08e-68114460857e",
"444939cd-ae63-4ce1-96a4-de74b77e3737"]
}
,
"message": {
"alert":"HELLO!",
"sound":"default",
"badge":7,
"someKey":"some value",
"anotherCustomKey":"some other value"
},
}
wdyt ?
interesting idea - it looks better structured.
Re
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile