On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
somehow the device needs to say: "I belong to android variant"
besides the @Id /PK, we can have a second field / column that represents:
* PushAppID
* VariantID
Yup. Having these would solve that
Was that your question?
On Friday, May 31, 2013, Lucas Holmquist wrote:
> something that i was thinking about after doing some examples is that i'm
> not sure how i feel about using the PK's of each table as the identifier to
> register/broadcast clients.
>
> We are sort of giving meaning to data that really shouldn't have meaning.
> it should really only be used to identify the row. It might be better to
> have another key on each table/object that is the identifier.
>
> So in one of the examples i did, the app on the device will register the
> device with the push server, but i needed to also include the id of the
> variant instance
>
> i guess i'm thinking if someone migrates their database, these keys
> could get messed up.
>
>
> wdyt?
>
>
> On May 28, 2013, at 2:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>
> in selective push is:
> ==> variant: iOS + alias: mwessendorf
> a valid criteria too?
>
>
>
> yes. let me update the related doc(s)
>
>
>
>
> On 28 May 2013 08:51, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 28 May 2013 08:48, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
>
> TYPO:
> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) +
> deviceType:iPadMini + alias: mwessendorf
> or
> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) +
> deviceType:iPhone + alias: mwessendorf
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>
> When doing selective push query, is there any overlap between mobile
> variant (which I understand like mobile type which contains certificates)
> and device type?
>
>
> MobileVariant (or call it type) is something like "Android", or
"iOS".
> deviceTypes would be iPad, iPod, iPhone, iWatch :) - or "Android Table",
> "Andrpid phone", android what not
>
>
> Sure.... ideally there are several variants:
> - iOS iPhone 5 optimised app in the app store
> - iOS iPhone 4s optimised app in the app store
> - iOS iPhone 3 optimised app in the app store
> - iOS iPad mini optimised app in the app store
> etc :)
>
> But, if there is only one variant, it's totally valid to install an iOS
> application (from the appstore), on an iPad and an iPhone;
>
>
> Both aimed at defining categories.
> Are those categories defined and fixed in the spec or can they be
> extended?
>
>
>
> I don't understand categories, here
>
>
> Can we do a selective push based on mobileType=mobile variant and
> alias=john@gmail?
>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev