We could
do that if we find a need for it later. But at the moment I think
we have enough to maintain as it is.
On 3 December 2014 at 11:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:46 AM, danielbevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com
> wrote:
> I'd like to delete the restsync
> <
>
https://github.com/danbev/aerogear-sync-server/tree/differential-synchron...
> >
> module from the differential-synchronization branch.
> As mentioned previously in this thread, I thought it might be nice to have
> it around but it is causing more confusion and not really being used.
>
+1
>
> Let me know anyone objects. If not I'd like to delete it tomorrow.
>
would it make sense to extract it, as a demo/example?
But well, not sure that makes sense since it may not be maintained, right ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> /Dan
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-aerogear-sync-serv...
> Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev