+1
On 21 May 2013 08:50, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Since there were no concerns, I guess I can treat this as a GO
(aka "Lazy Consensus")
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looking at the items targeted for our 1.0.1 release:
>
https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12319195
>
> Only two doc related items are "open" (both have PRs attached).
>
> The items, targeted for the actual library are all fixed.
>
> What is your take on releasing the library this week ?
>
>
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios
>
>
> Or, do you think the above listed items, in JIRA, are not enough?
>
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev