Maybe we should specify versions per dependency to avoid troubles in the
future.
Thoughts?
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
works here too, but not sure if that is really 'correct';
According to Kris (on IRC), something changed during our release so
that 'ruby-1.9.3-p429' is now required.
I guess I let the Ruby lovers clear up that.
@Erik: thanks - now I can at least build the site :-)
--
abstractj