Makes sense, I think that’s a great start is to integrate your idea against what Dan
already did to the server, into this way we can start to put together our puzzle.
--
abstractj
On January 9, 2014 at 12:37:19 PM, Summers Pittman (supittma(a)redhat.com) wrote:
> One of the things about using a provider that I don't like
is the
"using a provider". One of the things I hope sync to become is a
collection of tools, utilities, and patterns that our developers
can
adopt to add in sync to their web apps without having to add extra
services like couch, pouch, etc and without having to significantly
alter their application.
HOWEVER, I am still reading up on / playing with Couch so don't
count
me out on thinking it is a good way to go forward; I just havn't seen
any code to get the feel for how it will interact inside of AeroGear.
It is entirely possible that it will be / can be one of the tools
that
we use for some of our sync solution.