Re: [aerogear-dev] Travis on branches

+1 Den onsdagen den 17:e juli 2013 skrev Daniel Passos: +1 On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', &#39;bruno(a)abstractj.org&#39;);&gt;&gt; wrote: +1 - abstractj On Jul 16, 2013, 6:26 PM, Douglas Campos wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:09:55PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote: >> I would like to propose we only run Travis on changes to >> master (push, >> PR, etc). The problem I am having is pushing broken code to >> branches >> for review, testing, etc. is causing Travis to mark the repo >> as broken >> in the status image which is not true. Anyone have any other >> thoughts >> on this or feel that Travis breaking on branches is at all >> useful? > +1 > > I tend to lazily push branches while I'm fixing stuff (and > waiting for > travis feedback), but I'm fine with travis only running on > the branch > when I actually open the PR. > > -- > qmx > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > &#39;aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&#39;);&gt; > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', &#39;aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&#39;);&gt; https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev