+1
On Admin UI front, there are some issues with tooling around NPM that I
don't consider blocking 1.0.x releases (AGPUSH-863
<
>).
I.e. if we stay with current versions we are okay.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Sounds good to me!
On 1 August 2014 06:35, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> based on [1] I thought about our release timelines until 1.0.0.Final, and
> shortly after.
>
> -
>
> 1.0.0.Beta2
>
<
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12325092/?selectedTa...;:
> 07/Aug/14
>
> This needs to include Keycloak-beta4, and might slip by one day, but not
> much more of a delay.
>
> *Please note:* There is already works going on to have our parent and
> UPS working w/ beta4 - it’s just a matter of merging the branch, once the
> release is out.
>
> Number of open JIRAs for this release is looking good!
>
> -
>
> 1.0.0
>
<
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12323754/?selectedTa...;:
> 18/Aug/14
>
> *Keycloak:* This will use keycloak’s beta4 as well, unless we find
> BLOCKERS in their beta4... (As said before KC is mostly hidden inside the
> server, and we can not wait for their 1.0.0.Final in September)
>
> This release will be mostly around docs and perhaps some more UX review
> of the quickstart demos. It is possible that the UX review does not happen.
>
> *CODE FREEZE:* I’d suggest we do a *code freeze* for the UnifiedPush
> Server on 11/Aug/14. This is pretty much shortly after the beta2 and gives
> us one week of deep testing (of server, docs, demos) before the final
> release.
>
> Next: *celebrate*!!!!!!!! [image: :tada:]
>
> After the 1.0.0.Final of UPS, I’d suggest a two week-based release series
> of small fixes and improvements, as well as taking up new Keycloak releases
>
> -
>
> 1.0.1
>
<
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12325080/?selectedTa...;:
> 01/Sep/14
>
> *Keycloak:* main reason is pick-up of their 1.0-RC-1 and those few items
> from the JIRA.
>
> -
>
> 1.0.2
>
<
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12325081/?selectedTa...;:
> 15/Sep/14
>
> *Keycloak:* main reason is pick-up of their 1.0.0.Final
>
> -
>
> 1.0.3
>
<
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12325082/?selectedTa...
> :29/Sep/14
>
> Might not be needed - but added it to JIRA, just in case…
>
> Let me know your thoughts and I will update the roadmap!
>
> -Matthias
>
> [1]
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/2014-July/002360.html
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev