On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 27/03/2014 14:00, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
great! I'd don't see a huge problem here in pagination of the variatns;
I doubt that one PushApp has a gazillion different variants
I don't think it will be a problem either. When variants are going into
the bazillion numbers there will be many other problems in managing apart
from pagination. Managing them will practically become impossible.
>
>
>
> The Code Snippets : Yeah A button/link would be needed
>
>
> This are the "What's this for?" links. We might want to reconsider
the
> name for that.
>
Now, I open the details of a variant (by clicking on it), and I see the
LINK
Clicking on it will give me a "popup" with the different code-snippet
(note: we need Cordova + native), per variant, right ?
>
>
>
>
>>
>> - Sidebar: is that specific to an application? See notes on
>> "applications.png"
>> - The "Notifications" on the sidebar, what's that?
>> - What's the "gear-wheel" for ?
>>
>
> The gear menu will have contextual actions like "Rename" and
"Delete".
> It's less cluttered than having them as links or icons on every row.
>
ah!!! Took a bit to realize that :-)
>
>
>
>> * "dialogs.png"
>> - For an application construct, that's good enough; Creating a variant
>> is a bit more complex (see current UI)
>> - Is there no side bar for this?
>>
>
> I assume that for delete app/variant or reset id/secrets we will use
> the same dialogs
>
>>
>>
>> * installations.png
>> - Is there no side bar for this?
>> - If I understand the view/page correctly, its a list of ALL
>> installations for one PushApplication. However, we should list the variants
>> PER variant (see current UI). The Navigation path on the bread-crumbs
>> would be "Applications >> Mobile HR >> Demo (iOS) >>
Installations
>> (number)"
>>
> +1 but I think that was also Hylke's initial idea because on the
> application details screen you see that the link to installations is on the
> "variant" level. I think it was just a glitch in his bread-crumbs.
>
>
> I wasn't too sure about what we could do here. In some cases it's good
> to have installations per variant, in others you want to see them per
> application.
>
for now, I think, let's list them only per variant - feels (for me)
a bit more clean
I'm fine with that.
Thanks for the reply. I hope we are now all on the same page.
Oh, any chance to get a bit rid of that blue; replacing by a different
colour ? :-))
This is the blue from
patternfly.org, but we can discuss different
options. What about yellow and black stripes? :P
besides the black/yellow ;-) I think we all agreed on this design, right ?
Just wondering what's the state of this. For me feels like: yeah, and all
questions/suggestion were answered, and we seems to agree on the mentioned
items. At least I get that impression after re-reading this thread, 12 days
later :)
So, yeah +1 the outcome of this thread;
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf