On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:27:55 -0500
Kris Borchers<kris.borchers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey all, can I make a suggestion to reduce e-mail noise when merging PRs?
> Basically, I was the one that started doing the "thanks, landed
> messages on merges. There is no reason to add those comments when the SHA
> doesn't change. The only reason for those messages is to let the PR submitter
> know where their change landed when the SHA is different and the PR has to be
> manually closed.
> A standard merge will keep the SHAs intact and automatically close the PR,
> which is the usual case for most PR merges. If you ever have to rebase a PR
> for someone or you squash some of their commits then this would cause SHA
> changes and a "landed in<sha>" message is helpful.
> Also, there is usually no reason to add a "Merged<PR#>" comment.
> either generated by GitHub when you merge or in the case described above, the
> "landed in" message is good enough.
> Let me know if that doesn't make sense or if you have questions.
> aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev mailing list