On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On 08/03/2013, at 16:27, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> So I have spent too much time working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-932
to no avail. I keep running into permission issues and weird errors. Couple that with the
fact that I'm using a customized version of jsdoc, I don't see any reason we
should be including docs building in our build, nor do I think they should be part of the
So you mean removing only the generated assets, and I would still have those fancy jsdoc
comments on the code?
> The docs are duplicated on the site so if someone finds an issue, they can file an
issue on the site, then we can fix in the source and regenerate. Since we're also
removing the dist folder from the aerogear-js repo, this just seems like the right thing
to do as well to clean up this repo completely.
> Any thoughts or objections?
It would be good to have a jira for integrating this back later…
> P.S. - The only other thing I need to do is get my modified version of jsdoc up
somewhere (maybe my own repo for now) so that others can build the docs with the
modifications I have made. Any thoughts on that would also be appreciated.
We need to upstream those fixes!
If I can figure out the actual issue from something failing silently. :/
> aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev mailing list