Re: [aerogear-dev] [webpush] Message Encryption for Web Push

I heard it from Chromium team, so I think that they are working on client side for web browser. Will ask them for more information. Best regards, Idel Pivnitskiy -- E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> 2015-07-03 13:34 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;: > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy < > idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Not now. >> >> Shida Schubert (one of WG cochairs) announced a poll for adoption of >> current draft [1] as WG item (as a starting point for working on the only >> milestone for the WG) until next Wednesday (Jul 10th). For more info, see >> this thread [2]. >> Also, Martin Thomson added some small clarifications for the current >> draft [3]. >> >> Btw, Google works on WebPush too. Hope, Chrome will support it soon. >> > > Are they working on the actual wire-protocol? Or are they just on the > client side, meaning the JS APIs for WebPush? > > I think their current focus is using GCM behind the WebPush standard APIs > (some more context [1]). > > > [1] > https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/03/push-notificatons-on-th... >

> >> >> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-protocol-00.txt >> [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/msg00183.html >> [3] https://github.com/unicorn-wg/webpush-protocol/commits/master >> >> Best regards, >> Idel Pivnitskiy >> -- >> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com >> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> >> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> >> >> 2015-07-03 10:37 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;: >> >>> Hi Idel, >>> >>> thanks for sharing! >>> >>> Just wondering - do you know if there are any updates planed on the Web >>> Push draft itself ? >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy < >>> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Today WebPush WG released a new draft of Message Encryption for Web >>>> Push [1]. The changes are not significant. This draft clarifies behavior of >>>> encryption and decryption for push messages, which are longer then 4096 >>>> octets. For more information, see difference of two versions [2]. >>>> >>>> [1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt >>>> [2] >>>> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Idel Pivnitskiy >>>> -- >>>> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com >>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev