On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Do we want to also rename it.
the java sender is called( in maven ), ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’
while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’
i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or
‘unifiedpush-sender’
I like that
+1 for ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’
Or unifiedpush-node-sender
what do others think?
On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
:), do we a JIRA, i can whip something up for a guide
On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Whenever Luke is ready ? :)
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
wrote:
> +1
>
> When?
>
> On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > a few questions:
> > >
> > > * based on
> > >
> > >
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a...
> > >
> > > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ?
> > >
> > yes
> >
> > >
> > > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link
here:
> > >
> > >
>
http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integrat...
> > >
> > not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of the
> > github which contains instructions.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
>